TUESDAY, 27 JANUARY 2015 / TRUTH-OUT.ORG
In 10 Years, No One in Helsinki Will Even Want to Own a Car: Three Simple Ideas That Are Making Cities Sustainable
From Finland to California, the cities of the future are here.Despite Obama's Call for Cheap, Fast Internet, Many Cities Aren't Allowed to Provide It
Obama hailed the benefits of an open internet in his State of the Union address. Here's how he's trying to make it happen.
The Deleterious Effects of the Pesticides-Government-Industrial Complex in Oregon
Monday, 26 January 2015 14:51By Evaggelos Vallianatos, SpeakOut | Op-Ed- font size
- 0Email
It was with heavy heart I started reading a recent report of Oregon Health Authority, an agency of the state of Oregon. This report finalized a state and federal investigation into the 2011 poisoning of Oregonians by timber companies.
The poisoned victims live near private forests in the Highway 36 corridor in western Lane County. Ninety-five percent or 173,152 acres of the land in the scene of the crime is forest, almost equally divided between federal and private owners.
I suspected the Oregon report would not be revealing the truth. I read hundreds of such reports during my 25-year tenure at the US Environmental Protection Agency. My suspicion had nothing to do with my personal revulsion to the crime of poisoning. Rather, I followed the link to pesticides and their toxic history.
Chemical companies, large users of pesticides like timber companies and large farmers and state and federal agencies consider pesticides essential for industrialized farming and forestry. They have created a model of deception for the protection of pesticides that easily compares to the corruption, secrecy and security of the agencies protecting nuclear power plants and nuclear weapons.
No citizen or ethical scientist can easily take a look and understand the historical, bureaucratic and corporate black hole protecting pesticides.
Pesticides kill more than pests. They are biocides by design. Chemical industry lobbyists rather than lawgivers drafted the pesticide law. The legal text of this "law" is technical and exceedingly ambiguous - facilitating the cause of polluters.
Each major pesticide earns 10 to 20 million dollars per year for around 20 years.
The EPA has been facing fraudulent pesticide labs for most of its life. The pressure on EPA (from the industry, the White House, and Congress) not to discover more fraudulent labs has been such that EPA outsourced its responsibility for examining pesticide "safety" data.
As if fraudulent testing of pesticides was not a serious enough crime, the pesticide law added another giant loophole for even more crimes. The tested pesticide is never used alone. It is always mixed with several other toxic chemicals, which the EPA calls "inerts." These inerts, of course, are anything but inerts. They include carcinogenic petroleum distillates and other hazardous substances.
EPA's perverse definition of inerts conveniently covers-up science and enables the farmer or the timber company to spray a mixture of chemicals that, together, are many times more deleterious than the "tested" "active" ingredient (pesticide). In addition, this sophisticated, nay criminal, use of pesticides blurs the toxicity of the key pesticide, making it next to impossible to pinpoint its effects.
It's this criminality, carefully blended with ambiguous science and government regulation, which explain the survival of farm and timber biocides for so many decades. After all, organic farming makes them entirely unnecessary for producing food. We see the effects of their poisoning all over the natural world and in rapidly increasing human disease and death.
The defenders of pesticides, a cabal of private and government agencies, bamboozle anyone daring to challenge the safety of pesticides.
The Oregon poisoning incident illustrates this process of bad science and corruption. Oregonians living in the midst or borders of private forests have been ceaselessly sprayed with powerful weed killers. Most of the time, the victims get sick and move away from Oregon or get sick and possibly die silently in Oregon.
In the spring of 2011, however, a small group of the timber company victims decided to fight back. They collected urine samples and had them tested in a laboratory in Georgia. The lab found 2,4-D and atrazine in the urine. These are toxic herbicides or weed killers.
In fact, 2,4-D is also a chemical warfare agent. The US military used 2,4-D and its sibling, 2,4,5-T, in the form of Agent Orange in the Vietnam War.
We don't know whether the present-day 2,4-D is also contaminated by dioxin. But even without dioxin, 2,4-D is a potent killer.
Once the sprayed Oregonians presented the results of their tested urine samples to Oregon authorities, the government of Oregon sought the assistance of two federal agencies: the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Environmental Protection Agency. Three years later, the government of Oregon concluded the sprayed Oregonians had nothing to fear. The sprays (2,4-D and atrazine and other toxins) hit them at levels that could not hurt them.
The official 130-page report (Public Health Assessment: Highway 36 Corridor Exposure Investigation, October 2014) is full of acronyms and repetitive assertions. The dense text is full of questionable conclusions.
But the real purpose of the report is to protect both pesticides and their owners. In the toxic strategy of protecting pesticides, the report is the second phase of using bad science to cover-up the truth of the deleterious effects of pesticides.
The mighty government consortium, speaking with the presumed authority of science, is telling fearful victims not to worry, promising more research on their behalf.
One of the victims of timber spraying, Audrey Moore, reached her own conclusion about the Oregon report. She told me she loathed the "investigation." She attended town hall meetings and listened to what she described as "politically correct BS." Moore dismissed the report of an "investigation that never was."
Moore is paying the ultimate price. She has cancer. She is wise enough to direct her anger not only at the companies that spray pesticides but at the "void" and the "silence"… "from those who know." This means you and me. She asks: Why are we not up in arms protesting and resisting poisoned sprays and the undermining of life on Earth?
EVAGGELOS VALLIANATOS
Evaggelos Vallianatos is the author of several books, including Poison Spring, published in April 2014 by Bloomsbury Press.
GET DAILY TRUTHOUT UPDATES
LATEST STORIES
A Regime Change in Switzerland
By Paul Krugman, Krugman & Co. | Op-EdThe Collapse of Europe? The European Union May Be on the Verge of Regime Collapse
By John Feffer, TomDispatch | News AnalysisCurious Cure: Wisconsin GOP Injects Partisan Politics Into Nonpartisan Elections Board
By Rebekah Wilce, PR Watch | News AnalysisState of the Union Shows Obama Still Needs Movement Pressure on Climate
By Kate Aronoff, Waging Nonviolence | Op-Ed
FEATURED VIDEOS
Noam Chomsky Blasts "American Sniper" and the Media That Glorify It
By Janet Allon, AlterNet | Video"One Person Can Make a Difference": Ava DuVernay Remembers Film Critic Roger Ebert's Early Support
By Amy Goodman, Democracy Now! | Video Interview"Selma" Director Defends Film's Portrayal of LBJ-MLK Dispute on Voting Rights Legislation
By Amy Goodman, Democracy Now! | Video Interview
FEATURED ON SPEAKOUT
Katrina Pain Index 2012: Seven Years After
By Davida Finger and Bill Quigley, SpeakOut | News AnalysisA Dream Come True: Ed McCurdy's 1950s Folk Song and the Kellogg-Briand Pact
By David Swanson, War Is a Crime | OpinionRemembering Howard Zinn by Meditating on Teacher Unions and Tenure?
By P.L. Thomas, Daily Kos | Opinion2012 an EU Odyssey: No Time for Democracy in Greece
By Karen Moutaataou, Box TV | Video
POPULAR ON SPEAKOUT
Trident - UK's Instruments of Armageddon
By Jim McClusky, SpeakOut | Op-EdNominate a Qualified Undersecretary of Domestic Finance Now
By Simon Johnson, The Baseline Scenario | Op-EdA Year of Euromaidan: Mistakes and Implications of Revolution of Dignity
By Veronika Kyrylenko and Ryan Schinault,SpeakOut | Op-EdForeign Secretary Refused to Intervene for Brit Rendered to Ethiopia
By Staff, Reprieve | Press Release
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Comments
Post a Comment